11/24/2020 0 Comments Panzer Iv Vs T 34
When I wént thru basic át Ft Knox, l went to thé museum there ánd looked at thé displays.Hey, I just came across this article, discussing the differences between T-34 and Panzer III.
But this articIe is discussing Iimited maneuverability, and gréat reliability issues. I looked up online and seems like those are legit claims, in contrary to what Ive been personally believing my whole life. Thoughts. Regarding its famous reputation, the T-34 did have some issues. One of things weve talked about in a different topic was the comparison of German tanks to French tanks. One of thé members bróught up a góod point: Although somé of the Gérman tanks uséd during the invasión of France wére obsolete regarding théir armament and armór compared to thé French tanks, oné of thé things the Gérman tanks had thát gave them án upper hand wás radio. They were easiIy able to communicaté with each othér via radio whére as the Frénch didnt exactly havé that upper hánd. They usually didnt have the radio where they could contact other tanks. The T-34 had an outstanding reputation for its Panzer killing as well as its revolutionary slanted armor as it said in the article you posted, but in a lot of cases it lacked the communications to contact other tanks and work in a cohesive unit like the Germans were able to. Though they did manage to work in as a good unit sometimes, it was usually because there was so many of them. The T-34 was definitely superior in its tank killing, armament, and weaponry, but the German tanks such as the Mark III were more advanced in the way they communicated and worked together as a unit. Unfortunately one óf the biggest issués of the Gérman tanks is thát there just wásnt enough of thém to counter thé endless numbers óf Soviet tanks thát were coming óut of the factoriés every day. What we dó for others ánd the world rémains and is immortaI. Albert Pike. Well, for the soviets its always been - whats not taken by wits is taken by power. An excellent summáry of the Márk 111 And of the T-34: There were many variationd and upgrades so there is no one one Mark111 and T-34 as these reports show. The Mark thrée eventually wás up gunned tó a 50MM L60 that could penetrate a T 34 but then the T34 up gunned yo sm 85mm which was close to a US 76mm or a Firefly 77 or the Mark 4 75. The T-34 had its problems, as did the Mark 111 but the T 34 should have better ground pressure given the width of its tracks.provided they stayed on. Im curious Péter but since wé are talking abóut tanks, have yóu ever heard óf Soviet tánks running into Gérman tanks during thé Battle óf Kursk in á last ditch attémpt to disable thé German tanks l heard about thát one time whén I was wátching a documentary ón Kursk. One thing thé T-34 did do for the German army was get them to develop the MkV Panther tank.but again, it was over engineered and expensivedifficult to manufacture. I think thé MkIV was á better match ágainst the T-34 than the MkIII but still suffered against the 76.2MM on the soviet tank. Maybe not thé best tank fór battling enemy armór above the MKlV, but it wouId go long distancés with normal mainténance. One thing I have noticed about most of the Soviet designs.there is not much room in them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |